The last comparison allows! with the same protocol! to Lightweight bikes 2014 compare the
behavior of some mountain bikes. The original wheels were replaced
by the ZIPP 404 to be able to compare the bikes with each other and also with
respect to the aero models. As we can see! none of the lightweight bikes perform
as well as their aero counterpart with for example 3min 15 difference between the
Canyon Ultimate CF SLX 2014 Vs Aeroad CF SLX 2015!
Now that we have a small idea
of the potential gains
of aerodynamic improvements at 45 km/h! it is interesting whatsapp number list to Lightweight bikes 2014 see what
happens at 30 km/h. As we have seen! the sum of the improvements at 40/45
km/h can quickly reach 50 watts. This will allow you to ride 2 to 3 km/h faster
if we look at the first table. At 30 km/h we can assume 5x less
aerodynamic gain in watts as Cervelo estimates with an improvement of 1.3 km/h.
reduce this to second gear on a 20 km time trial! at 40 km/h the gain will be
1’26 and at 30 km/h 1’47! So just as valid!
latest study available from Tour Int confirms this. In partnership with
Specialized! which developed its own analysis tunnel! Tour Int wanted to compare
whether the Tunnel’s gains were reflected in
the field and whether low-level cyclists could also benefit from the
aerodynamic improvements.
The Specialized simulator
They therefore compared the what is b2b lead generation’s importance? influence on a cyclist
of standard equipment (wheel! helmet! clothing! Spé Tarmarck bike) with a
completely aero set (wheels! helmets! aero clothing + Spé Venge). On a hilly terrain
of 20 km with 100 mD+ as on the tunnel/simulator! each participant evolving between 35
and 45 km/H saw his speed increase by 2 km/H on average with the aero clean email solution (and rather 3.5 km/H
on the flat and descending parts!).